From J. D. Hooker 27 February 1862
Kew
Feb 27/62
Dear Darwin
I am greatly pleased & indeed relieved by your letter.1 for no one but Oliver (who can judge) has pronounced any opinion on my Greenland paper,2 & I find that one is so easily deceived as to the value of such researches, that I was any thing but sanguine of your approval. You have caught me up in a great blunder at p. 264. where the 4 should be 0.—3 on turning to the proof sheets (which I have kept) I find both this & the fig 8. of same line (which should have been 5) marked by myself for correction: but the correction not inserted by some accident of my own. I must correct it in the forthcoming number. it is very awkward & stupid.
I do not attach much importance to there being no Arctic Asiatic species in mts. of trop. Asia, both considering how low latter are & because Arctic Asia is itself so wretchedly poor a flora.— & it is quite met by the fact of such an Arctic European species being in the Mts of the Peninsula (which is not in Himalaya!—) as Alchemilla vulgaris, which seems to indicate some current of migration from Europe or W. asia down S.E. to Peninsula & Ceylon. & is an awful staggerer to bridge migrations.
I will send you Lythrum &c. as soon as weather improves I fear Masdevallia is all out of flower but will see & let you have the plant if worth sending on4
I have a hazy recollection of Link’s speculation. where is it?5
I think with you that it is perhaps better not to bring a resume of sexual orchids before Linnæan; but wish indeed you will give us a note on our trimorphous Gongora of Schomburgk,6 which Bentham & I certainly should like to see noticed, however shortly, in our Journal or Transactions.7 It has long been considered as one of the most wonderful things in the Society’s possession: & the explanation of it should certainly appear in our publications.
Do not bother any more about the box, the irregularity was of our Rail-way here in not sending a Rl. ticket—8which reminds me that you should not prepay every thing as you do: there is not the least occasion for it.
I suppose you will hardly be able to get up to Oliver’s Lecture on Tertiary Floras, at R.I. next Friday. Evg.9
Ever yours affec | J D Hooker
CD annotations
Footnotes
Bibliography
Link, Heinrich Friedrich. 1821. Die Urwelt und das Alterthum, erläutert durch die Naturkunde. Berlin. [Vols. 8,10]
Schomburgk, Robert Hermann. 1837. On the identity of three supposed genera of orchideous epiphytes. [Read 15 November 1836.] Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 17 (1837): 551–2. [Vols. 9,10]
‘Three sexual forms of Catasetum tridentatum’: On the three remarkable sexual forms of Catasetum tridentatum, an orchid in the possession of the Linnean Society. By Charles Darwin. [Read 3 April 1862.] Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society (Botany) 6 (1862): 151–7. [Collected papers 2: 63–70.]
Summary
Pleased at CD’s opinion of his Arctic plants paper. CD has caught great blunder.
Lack of Arctic–Asiatic species in mountains of tropical Asia does not trouble him. Species seem to indicate some "current of migration" from Europe and W. Asia southeastward to Ceylon – an awful staggerer to bridge migrations.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-3461
- From
- Joseph Dalton Hooker
- To
- Charles Robert Darwin
- Sent from
- Kew
- Source of text
- DAR 101: 15–16
- Physical description
- ALS 4pp †
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 3461,” accessed on 26 September 2022, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-3461.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 10