skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

Search: contains ""

400 Bad Request

Bad Request

Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.


Apache Server at dcp-public.lib.cam.ac.uk Port 443
Search:
in keywords
4 Items

2.14 Boehm, Westminster Abbey roundel

Summary

< Back to Introduction A bronze plaque or medallion with a portrayal of Darwin was installed in Westminster Abbey in 1888, six years after his grand funeral and burial there. Like the seated statue of Darwin in the Natural History Museum of 1884–1885…

Matches: 13 hits

  • A bronze plaque or medallion with a portrayal of Darwin was installed in Westminster Abbey in 1888, …
  • in 1888 mentions abronze medallion portrait head of Mr. Darwin . . . lately . . . erected by his
  • bigoted rejection of the scientific advances associated with Darwins name, and a lack of patriotism
  • filled the Abbey. Perhaps anticipating this difficulty, Darwins half-cousin Francis Galton proposed
  • funds and attention to the Natural History Museum statue of Darwinthis idea was not taken up, but
  • the walls at this part are fully covered’. In the event, Darwin was buried in the north nave aisle
  • 1882, was not followed up; and the bronze plaque portraying Darwin, which was commissioned a few
  • Nowhere was there scope for an inscription to record Darwins achievements; nor could his family
  • cornerwas gradually created (c.18931915), in which Darwins portrayal became just one in a group
  • of George Gabriel Stokes, erected in 1904, matched that of Darwin, and, in between them, three round
  • plaques commemorating James Prescott Joule, Joseph Hooker (Darwins closest friend), and William
  • moulded frame; a decorative cartouche is inscribed simplyDARWIN’. His mild and thoughtful face, …
  • of the Muniments of Westminster Abbey, Matthew Payne. ‘Mr. Darwins funeral’, Daily News (26

Movement in Plants

Summary

The power of movement in plants, published on 7 November 1880, was the final large botanical work that Darwin wrote. It was the only work in which the assistance of one of his children, Francis Darwin, is mentioned on the title page. The research for this…

Matches: 25 hits

  • 7 November 1880was the final large botanical work that Darwin wrote. It was the only work in which
  • about their research while he was away from home. Although Darwin lacked a state of the art research
  • research being pursued by other naturalists who, like Francis, had come to this centre for the study
  • methods and use the most advanced laboratory equipment. Darwin also benefitted from the instrument
  • copied but also improved on some of the apparatuses that Francis had been introduced to at Würzburg. …
  • plant physiology, but it was at its core informed by Darwins theory of evolution, particularly by
  • early 1860s, at a time when his health was especially bad, Darwin had taken up the study of climbing
  • reproduced as a small book, giving it a much wider audience. Darwin was not the first naturalist to
  • which eventually appeared in 1875. In the same year, Darwin published a much longer work,  …
  • had considered combining the works in a single volume ( letter to J. V. Carus, 7 February 1875 ). …
  • from all over Europe and beyond. When Darwins son Francis worked in this laboratory in the summers
  • had also asked Horace to discuss the point with his friend Francis Balfour(258). Darwin promised to
  • of any success. &#039;. Just two months later, Darwin put Francis in charge of this aspect of the
  • … , a plant that exhibited all three types of movement ( letter from RILynch, [before 28 July
  • more familiar with the research in Sachss laboratory as Franciss departure for Würzburg was
  • to Wurzburg, &amp; work by myself will be dull work’ . Francis was in Würzburg until early August. …
  • the woodblock using photography for scientific accuracy ( letter from JDCooper13 December
  • lost colour, withered, and died within a couple of days ( letter from A. F. Batalin28 February
  • how their observations could have been so much at odds ( letter to Hugo de Vries 13 February 1879
  • the botanist Gaetano Durando, to find plants and seeds ( letter to Francis Darwin, [4 February8
  • only the regulator &amp; not cause of movement ’. In the same letter, Darwin discussed terminology, …
  • to replace FranksTransversal-Heliotropismus’ ( letter from WEDarwin10 February [1880] ). …
  • experiments and devised a new test, which he described in a letter to his mother, ‘ I did some
  • and it appeared in 1880 (F. Darwin 1880b). In the same letter, Francis revealed the frustration of
  • on holiday in the Lake District, Darwin received a long letter from De Vries detailing his latest

Darwin’s study of the Cirripedia

Summary

Darwin’s work on barnacles, conducted between 1846 and 1854, has long posed problems for historians. Coming between his transmutation notebooks and the Origin of species, it has frequently been interpreted as a digression from Darwin’s species work. Yet…

Matches: 25 hits

  • Darwins work on barnacles, conducted between 1846 and 1854, has long posed
  • … , it has frequently been interpreted as a digression from Darwins species work. Yet when this study
  • anomalous. Moreover, as the letters in this volume suggest, Darwins study of cirripedes, far from
  • classification using the most recent methods available, Darwin was able to provide a thorough
  • his views on the species question (Crisp 1983).    Darwins interest in invertebrate zoology
  • Robert Edmond Grant. In his Autobiography (pp. 4950), Darwin recalled: ‘Drs. Grant and
  • numerous references to the ova of various invertebrates, and Darwins first scientific paper, …
  • marine organisms was exercised during the Beagle voyage. Darwin expressed his current enthusiasm
  • earlier researches in Edinburgh on the ova of invertebrates, Darwin was particularly well prepared
  • In 1835, in the Chonos Archipelago off the coast of Chile, Darwin foundmost curiousminute
  • In the zoological notes made during the Beagle voyage, Darwin recorded: ‘The thick shell of some
  • the absence of a shell and its unusual parasitic nature, Darwin recognised that it differed greatly
  • Such a revaluation had not been undertaken when, in 1846, Darwin began to examine several
  • of as many genera as I could procure.’ For fourteen months Darwin pursued an anatomical study of
  • British Museum and himself a cirripede expert, suggested to Darwin that he prepare a monograph of
  • was challenged in 1859 by August Krohn. As he admitted in a letter to Charles Lyell, 28 September
  • … (as Darwin called it in his Autobiography and in his letter to Lyell), was more than a matter of
  • Toward the end of his study of Balanus , in a letter to Hooker on 25 September [1853] ( …
  • latter instrument suited his purposes well; he reported in a letter to Richard Owen, 26 March 1848
  • and mounting his specimens is well demonstrated by a letter he wrote to Charles Spence Bate, 13
  • Informing Darwin about the award ( Correspondence vol. 5, letter from J. D. Hooker, [4 November
  • it was empirically invalid ( Calendar nos. 2118 and 2119, letter to T. H. Huxley, 5 July [1857] …
  • … ^9^ CD discussed his conception of archetype in a letter to Huxley, 23 April [1853] ( …
  • to the analogy with plants in Living Cirripedia (1851): 214: ‘Although the existence of
  • can be seen in the collection of slides that, through Francis Darwin, he gave to the University

Darwin in letters, 1847-1850: Microscopes and barnacles

Summary

Darwin's study of barnacles, begun in 1844, took him eight years to complete. The correspondence reveals how his interest in a species found during the Beagle voyage developed into an investigation of the comparative anatomy of other cirripedes and…

Matches: 26 hits

  • Species theory In November 1845, Charles Darwin wrote to his friend and confidant Joseph
  • hurrah for my species-work’ ( Correspondence  vol. 3, letter to J. D. Hooker, [5 or 12 November
  • and  Fossil Cirripedia  (1851, 1854). What led Darwin to engage in this work when he was
  • group. Light is shed on the close relationship between Darwins systematic descriptive work and the
  • often frustrating taxonomical maze. Throughout these years, Darwin was also struggling with a
  • explained in detail in letters to friends and relatives, Darwin felt sufficiently restored in health
  • Nevertheless, it is evident from his correspondence that Darwins two hours at the microscope did
  • Phillips, and Daniel Sharpe, demonstrating the extent of Darwins continued involvement in
  • and naturalists, most notably James Dwight Dana, Henry Darwin Rogers, and Bernhard Studer, and the
  • In the midst of all this activity, Hooker responds to Darwins particular queries and sends
  • British government in scientific research during the period. Darwin also contributed to these
  • scientific work of naval officers and travellers in general. Darwin was asked by the editor, Sir
  • by Darwin on the use of microscopes on board ship ( see letter to Richard Owen, [26 March 1848] ). …
  • to Milne directly, he sent a long rejoinder in the form of a letter for publication in the Scotsman. …
  • asked for it to be destroyed. Only the draft of Darwins letter remains ( letter to the  Scotsman
  • that his original fieldwork wastime thrown away’ ( letter to Charles Lyell, 8 [September 1847] ) …
  • that it would be athorn in the side of É de B.’ (letter to Charles Lyell, 3 January 1850 ). …
  • marine invertebrates himself (see Correspondence vol. 2, letter to Leonard Jenyns, 10 April [1837]) …
  • opinion that such a monograph was adesideratum’ ( letter to J. L. R. Agassiz, 22 October 1848 ), …
  • abortive stamens or pistils ( Correspondence  vol. 2, letter from J. S. Henslow, 21 November
  • plants from monoecious forms (Living Cirripedia (1851): 214; (1854): 29, 528 n.) and, at another
  • care what you say, my species theory is all gospel.—’ ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 10 May 1848 ). …
  • sacrifice the rule of priority for the sake of expedience ( letter to H. E. Strickland, [4 February
  • it asthe greatest curse to natural History’ ( letter to H. E. Strickland, 29 January [1849] ). …
  • to support a large family (three more children, Elizabeth, Francis, and Leonard, were born during
  • of men of science, circulated many years later by his cousin Francis Galton, is particularly