skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

Search: contains ""

400 Bad Request

Bad Request

Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.


Apache Server at dcp-public.lib.cam.ac.uk Port 443
Search:
in keywords
3 Items

Volume appendices

Summary

Here is a list of the appendices from the print volumes of the Correspondence of Charles Darwin with links to adapted online versions where they are available. Appendix I in each volume contains translations of letters in foreign languages and these can…

Matches: 3 hits

  • … and these can be accessed online by searching for a letter and clicking on the translation tab on …
  • … 8 V Patrick Matthew's letter to the Gardeners’ Chronicle …
  • … German poems presented to Charles Darwin in February 1877 25 VII …

Movement in Plants

Summary

The power of movement in plants, published on 7 November 1880, was the final large botanical work that Darwin wrote. It was the only work in which the assistance of one of his children, Francis Darwin, is mentioned on the title page. The research for this…

Matches: 19 hits

  • … had considered combining the works in a single volume ( letter to J. V. Carus, 7 February 1875 ). …
  • …   ‘Very curious results’ In May 1877, Darwin asked one of his most trusted …
  • … , a plant that exhibited all three types of movement ( letter from R. I. Lynch, [before 28 July …
  • … than close friends, Darwin was more circumspect; he told Gaston de Saporta, ‘ I am at present …
  • … the woodblock using photography for scientific accuracy ( letter from J. D. Cooper, 13 December …
  • … lost colour, withered, and died within a couple of days ( letter from A. F. Batalin, 28 February …
  • … when there were conflicts. After reading a paper by Hugo de Vries in which the author remarked that …
  • … how their observations could have been so much at odds ( letter to Hugo de Vries 13 February 1879 …
  • … the botanist Gaetano Durando, to find plants and seeds ( letter to Francis Darwin, [4 February – 8 …
  • … only the regulator & not cause of movement ’. In the same letter, Darwin discussed terminology, …
  • … to replace Frank’s ‘Transversal-Heliotropismus’ ( letter from W. E. Darwin, 10 February [1880] ). …
  • … experiments and devised a new test, which he described in a letter to his mother, ‘ I did some …
  • … and it appeared in 1880 (F. Darwin 1880b). In the same letter, Francis revealed the frustration of …
  • … also mentioned he wanted to visit the laboratory of Anton de Bary in Strasbourg on his way home. …
  • … on holiday in the Lake District, Darwin received a long letter from De Vries detailing his latest …
  • … & refer to your evidence before the Spring ’. Luckily, De Vries published two papers in 1879 …
  • … described as ‘little discs’ and ‘greenish bodies’ ( letter to W. T. Thiselton-Dyer, 29 October 1879 …
  • … those of Gray, who had written an article on the subject in 1877 (A. Gray 1877e). Gray had reported …
  • … Just before he left, he received a copy of Alphonse de Candolle’s  Phytographie  (A. de Candolle …

Darwin in letters, 1863: Quarrels at home, honours abroad

Summary

At the start of 1863, Charles Darwin was actively working on the manuscript of The variation of animals and plants under domestication, anticipating with excitement the construction of a hothouse to accommodate his increasingly varied botanical experiments…

Matches: 21 hits

  • that he wasunwell & must write briefly’ ( letter to John Scott, 31 May [1863] ), and in a
  • persevered with his work on Variation until 20 July, his letter-writing dwindled considerably. The
  • fromsome Quadrumanum animal’, as he put it in a letter to J. D. Hooker of 24[–5] February [1863] …
  • … ‘I declare I never in my life read anything grander’ ( letter to T. H. Huxley, 26 [February 1863] …
  • than  Origin had (see  Correspondence  vol. 8, letter to Charles Lyell, 10 January [1860] ). …
  • from animals like the woolly mammoth and cave bear ( see letter from Jacques Boucher de Perthes, 23
  • leap from that of inferior animals made himgroan’ ( letter to Charles Lyell, 6 March [1863] ). …
  • out that species were not separately created’ ( letter to Charles Lyell, 17 March [1863] ). Public
  • book he wished his one-time mentor had not said a word ( letter to J. D. Hooker, 24[–5] February
  • I respect you, as my old honoured guide & master’ ( letter to Charles Lyell, 6 March [1863] ). …
  • against stronger statements regarding species change ( letter from Charles Lyell, 11 March 1863 ). …
  • thinking, while Huxleys book would scare them off ( see letter from Asa Gray, 20 April 1863 ). In
  • change of species by descent put himinto despair’ ( letter to Asa Gray, 11 May [1863] ). In the
  • disaffected towards Lyell and his book. In a February letter to the  Athenæum , a weekly review of
  • find great difficulty in answering Owen  unaided ’ ( letter from J. D. Hooker, [23 February 1863] …
  • of so much of Lyells book being written by others’ ( letter from J. D. Hooker, [23 February 1863] …
  • … ( Origin , p. 484). Owen preferred Jean Baptiste de Lamarcks explanation of the origin of life: …
  • Appendix III), and of the Société des Sciences Naturelles de Neuchâtel ( see letter from La Société …
  • but he was happy that the respected Swiss botanist Alphonse de Candolle sent information on the
  • in France. Candolle had sent his monograph on oaks (A. de Candolle 1862b), which included a
  • calledprudent reservations’ ( letters to Alphonse de Candolle, 14 January [1863] and 31