skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

Search: contains "1860 letter Huxley, T. H."

Darwin Correspondence Project
Search:
1860 and letter and Huxley and T and H in keywords disabled_by_default
1875 in date disabled_by_default
2 Items
Sorted by:  
Page: 1

To T. H. Huxley   6 January 1875

Summary

Thanks THH for his article in the Academy and his defence of CD and G. H. Darwin against Mivart. Still thinks he should write plainly to Mivart.

Author:  Charles Robert Darwin
Addressee:  Thomas Henry Huxley
Date:  6 Jan 1875
Classmark:  Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 313)
Letter no:  DCP-LETT-9804

Matches: 1 hit

  • letter from T.  H.  Huxley, 23 December 1874 ). See also ibid. , Appendix V. Samuel Wilberforce , the bishop of Oxford, died in 1873. In his article in the Academy , Huxley referred scathingly to an anonymous review of Origin in the Quarterly Review ; the review was in fact by Wilberforce and had been suspected to be by Wilberforce almost from the first by CD ( [Wilberforce] 1860 ; …

To J. D. Hooker   6 January [1875]

thumbnail

Summary

Is not inclined to restrain himself from expressing his opinion of Mivart. Huxley’s article in Academy.

Author:  Charles Robert Darwin
Addressee:  Joseph Dalton Hooker
Date:  6 Jan [1875]
Classmark:  DAR 95: 365–6
Letter no:  DCP-LETT-9805

Matches: 1 hit

  • 1860] . In his letter of 3 January [1875] , Hooker had written to CD that he was going to consult Thomas Henry Huxley about what action he should take over St George Jackson Mivart’s anonymous attack on George Howard Darwin in the Quarterly Review ( [Mivart] 1874 , p.  70). John Lubbock’s book was on British wild flowers ( Lubbock 1875 ). In his review of Ernst Haeckel’s Anthropogenie ( Haeckel 1874 ) in the Academy , 2 January 1875, pp.  16–17, Thomas Henry Huxley had criticised the insinuations of the ‘anonymous reviewer’ against G.  H.   …