From Asa Gray 20 April 1863
Cambridge. Mass.
April 20, 1863
My Dear Darwin
You asked me to tell you—when I had read it, what I thought of Sir Chas. Lyell’s book.1 I have only today finished the perusal of the copy he kindly sent me, i.e. all but half of the matter on Glacial period2—which I reserve till I can read it more attentively. Throughout it is a very interesting and to me a very satisfactory book. It is three books.— 1. a capital resumé and examination of what we know about the evidence of antiquity of man,3—no evidence we had not read of before,—but very clearly presented, of course.—4 2. a treatise on Glacial Per⟨iod.⟩5 Out of this I have m⟨uch to⟩ learn, and must read it all again carefully. Of a part I have not yet cut the leaves.
3. On transmutation-matters.6 That part of the book I can judge somewhat of, and I declare it first-rate. It is just about what I expected, and is characteristic of the man. I think that you, and Hooker, are unreasonable in complaining of Lyell that he does not come out “flat-footed” as we say, as an advocate of natural-selection transmutation.7 For 1. it is evident that tho’ inclined strongly towards ⟨it⟩ he is by no means satis⟨fied⟩ that nat. sel. will do ⟨all the⟩ work you put upon it. 2nd. He very plainly implies nearly all you would have him say. And, 3rd, he serves your cause (supposing it to be well-founded) quite as effectually,—perhaps, by his guarded position,8—by his keeping the position of a judge rather than of an advocate, and by considering still the case as not yet ripe for a decision.9
Very skillfully, too, has he presented the case of transmutation so as to commend it, as much as possible, to us orthodox people. (Huxley, I suppose, whose two books I have not seen, would put it in a way to frighten us off);10 indeed I think he has shown remarkable judgment and taste, & will have much success in disarming prejudice— And this is all you could ask.
The Chapter on language makes the points I supposed would be made,11 or some of them, but only dips in;—leaving more to be said. But this is rather ticklish ground,—for, if we are not careful here, you would get the better of us in this field quoad designs.12
If I had got the book 3 or 4 weeks earlier, I should have worked in some notice of the last chapter into my review of De Candolle &c, on Species—in May no. of Sill. Journal.13
Now please, do not think of being ill this spring, and passing all your valuable time—wasting it—at water-cure.14
I have really—as you see, nothing special to write of this week, & no time to read what I have hurriedly penned. | Ever Yours cordially | Asa Gray
Footnotes
Bibliography
Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.
Van Riper, A. Bowdoin. 1993. Men among the mammoths: Victorian science and the discovery of human prehistory. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Summary
AG’s opinion of Lyell’s Antiquity of man.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-4112
- From
- Asa Gray
- To
- Charles Robert Darwin
- Sent from
- Cambridge, Mass.
- Source of text
- DAR 165: 134
- Physical description
- ALS 4pp damaged
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 4112,” accessed on 28 November 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-4112.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 11