To J. D. Hooker 24–5 May [1861]
Down. | Bromley. | Kent. S.E.
May 24th
My dear Hooker
Thanks for your two notes.1 I am glad that the Burial is over & sincerely sympathise & can most fully understand your feelings at your loss.2 I grieve to think how little I saw of Henslow for many years. With respect to a biography of Henslow, I cannot help feeling rather doubtful, on the principle that a biography could not do him justice. His letters were generally written in a hurry & I fear he did not keep any Journal or Diary. If there were any vivid materials to describe his life as Parish-priest, & manner of managing the poor it would be very good.
I am never very sanguine on literary projects, I cannot help fearing his Life might turn out flat. There can hardly be marked incidents to describe.— I sincerely hope that I take a wrong & gloomy view; but I cannot help fearing. I would rather see no life than one that would interest very few. It will be a pleasure & duty in me to consider what I can recollect; but at present I can think of scarcely anything. The equability & perfection of Henslows whole character, I shd. think would make it very difficult for anyone to pourtray him.— I have been thinking about Henslow all day a good deal; but the more I think the less I can think of to write down. It is quite a new style for me to set about; but I will continue to think what I could say to give any, however imperfect, notion of him in the old Cambridge days.3
Pray give my kindest remembrances to L. Jenyns, who is often associated with my recollection of those old happy days.4 It is really fearful to think of Babington in that Chair.5
With respect to your former note, thank you for telling me about Lyell: it makes me easy about him.6 From what you say about London Review, it will be better to encourage Editor, & I have written to order it for myself.—7 Two of your Himalayan Rhododendrons have flowered; R. formosum (I think) splendid dark crimson & R. Thompsoni(?) more like an Azalea—orange shading into Reddish orange.—8
I have just reread your note: perhaps I am wrong to give my first impression that it would be very difficult to give a good & vivid Biography; & that a flat Biography is a doubtful good. I hope I am wholly wrong; but I thought it best to give my first impression.— I will see what I can do; but it will be miserably poor.—
My dear Hooker | Ever yours | C. Darwin
25th— P.S. Please let me hear, as soon as you have decided anything about the Biography, as I will merely jot down (which I have begun to do) anything which occurs to me, but will not attempt to arrange till I hear. Two or three pages is the utmost which I could do; for I find that my recollections are not defined enough.
Footnotes
Bibliography
Autobiography: The autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809–1882. With original omissions restored. Edited with appendix and notes by Nora Barlow. London: Collins. 1958.
Collected papers: The collected papers of Charles Darwin. Edited by Paul H. Barrett. 2 vols. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. 1977.
Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.
Fish: Pt IV of The zoology of the voyage of HMS Beagle. By Leonard Jenyns. Edited and superintended by Charles Darwin. London. 1840–2. [Vols. 2,3,4,9]
Turrill, William Bertram. 1963. Joseph Dalton Hooker. Botanist, explorer, and administrator. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.
Summary
CD’s doubts on biography of Henslow. Writing recollections of Cambridge days at JDH’s request.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-3155
- From
- Charles Robert Darwin
- To
- Joseph Dalton Hooker
- Sent from
- Down
- Source of text
- DAR 115: 101
- Physical description
- ALS 7pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 3155,” accessed on 24 November 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-3155.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 9