To Charles Cardale Babington 22 February [1858]1
Down Bromley Kent
Feb. 22d
Dear Babington
You have sometimes kindly given me information, & now I want to beg the favour of your answering me a theoretical question or rather a Botanico-Metaphysical question.
Hooker has made a remark to me, which I cannot credit, & I told I would ask one or two other Botanists & not give any guide on our opinions & that he agreed would be fair.2
“Do you think that good Botanists in drawing up a local Flora, whether small or large, or in making a general Prodromus, would almost universally, but unconsciously & unintentionally, tend to record (marking with greek letters in usual way) varieties in the large or in the small genera? Or would the tendency be to record the varieties nearly equally in genera of all sizes? Are you yourself conscious on reflexion, that you have attended to, & more carefully recorded the varieties in large or small or very small genera?”
You will observe the question does not in the least concern whether big or small genera are more or less variable, but whether there is a stronger tendency to record them more in one case than the other.
I shd. be infinitely obliged if you would be so kind as to consider this case & let me hear your answer, & believe me | Dear Babington | Yours sincerely | C. Darwin
Footnotes
Summary
CD and J. D. Hooker have differed on the following question and agreed to ask several botanists: would a good botanist describing a local flora record varieties as readily in large as in small genera?
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-2220
- From
- Charles Robert Darwin
- To
- Charles Cardale Babington
- Sent from
- Down
- Source of text
- Cambridge University Library (MS Add.8182: 20)
- Physical description
- ALS 4pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 2220,” accessed on 19 October 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-2220.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 7