To Werner von Voigts-Rhetz 14 May 1881
Private
Dear Sir,—
Although I am resolved not to enter into any controversy on vivisection, yet the great courtesy of your letter compels me to answer it.1 I published my letter to Prof. Holmgren, solely as I thought it my duty to do so, having long deliberated on the subject.—2 In a short 2d letter published in the Times (April 22d) I have given though too briefly, my reasons for believing that English Physiologists do not deserve the accusations heaped on them.3 The R. Commission was granted not on account of any sufficient evidence of cruelty, but from vague & as I believe unfounded rumours— You quote Dr Hoggan & his published letters wd have led anyone to suppose that he referred to English Laboratories, but when examined he was forced to confess that he had not seen any experiments performed in England.—4 Dr Kleins conduct has always been [illeg] to me, & I suspect that he spoke out of bravado with the intention of studying Englishness5 The sole point which I regret in my first letter to the Times is that I did not express more plainly my belief that useless suffering has been & probably is still caused in foreign laboratories; but I positively know so many atrociously false accusations have been published in this country against physiologists, that I felt somewhat sceptical with respect foreign lands.— You quote Zollner as authority but I am surprised that anyone shd. trust in his judgment.6 Cuvier never attended to Physiology.7 With respect to Sir W. Thompson though the greatest of physicists he knows nothing about physiology or biology; & he informed my son, that a lady, who is vehement anti vivisectionist, to whom he had written on the subject had interpolated sentences in his answer & had then published them as coming from him.8
Finally I cannot modify my deliberate conviction, that he who arrests the progress of physiology, commits a crime against mankind.—
With my renewed thanks for the courtesy of your letter, I remain Dear Sir | respectfully
To à | M. W. de Voigts-Rhetz | Oberkirch | G. Duché de Baden | Germany
May 14th 1881
Footnotes
Bibliography
French, Richard D. 1975. Antivivisection and medical science in Victorian society. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Report of the Royal Commission on vivisection: Report of the Royal Commission on the practice of subjecting live animals to experiments for scientific purposes; with minutes of evidence and appendix; 1876 (C.1397, C.1397-1) XLI.277, 689. House of Commons Parliamentary Papers.
Stromberg, Wayne H. 1989. Helmholtz and Zoellner: nineteenth-century empiricism, spiritism, and the theory of space perception. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 25: 371–83.
Thompson, Silvanus P. 1910. The life of William Thomson, Baron Kelvin of Largs. 2 vols. London: Macmillan and Co.
Summary
CD defends English physiologists on vivisection.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-13156
- From
- Charles Robert Darwin
- To
- Werner Adolf Friedrich Wilhelm (Werner) von Voigts-Rhetz
- Sent from
- Down
- Source of text
- DAR 185: 50
- Physical description
- ADraft 2pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 13156,” accessed on 9 November 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-13156.xml