My dear Sir,

I have now consulted some good literary and scientific judges. All agree that your statement is a very good one, and all are unanimous that I ought not myself to take any notice of M^r Butler’s attack.¹ On these grounds they advise me to ask you to be so good as to send your letter direct to:—

“W. S. Dallas Esq

Geolog Soc

Burlington House

London”

asking him without any allusion to me to be so kind as to translate and publish your letter in the Pop: Sc: Review. If he should refuse I should ask you to authorize its being sent to ‘Nature’; but my advisers think that as Dallas translated your book, his journal would be the most appropriate place.² I am myself very anxious that your letter should appear in English, so that if my character in future years is attacked, my sons could refer to your letter as well as to the article in Kosmos as a complete answer.³ Finally permit me to thank you cordially for having spontaneously written these articles, and believe me that I grieve that your time should have been lost in so frivolous & vexatious an affair.

My dear Sir | Yours very sincerely | Charles Darwin

P.S. | Since this note was written I have received your last very kind letter; and what you say about delay has altered my opinion and that of my family. We all think that ‘Nature’, which has a circulation of 5,000, would be much better than the Athenæum.⁴ In order that neither I nor my sons should be concerned with your letter, will you be so kind as to send it to

‘F. Balfour Esq FRS

Trin: Coll:

Cambridge’

He has been staying here and offered to translate your letter and send it to ‘Nature’.⁵ He is one of our most distinguished Naturalists, and a man universally respected. You will have to alter your first sentence to adapt it for ‘Nature’; and permit me to add that it seems to me unadvisable at this particular time to refer to Herings works.⁶ You can yourself make the alteration indicated in your P.S.

I do hope that this will be your last trouble in the affair.

C. D.