skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

From W. R. Browne   [20–2] November [1881]1

38, Belgrave Road. S.W.

Nov. 2⁠⟨⁠rest of line missing⁠⟩⁠

Dear Sir

On Jan ⁠⟨⁠  ⁠⟩⁠th last an informal conference was held at Lambe⁠⟨⁠t⁠⟩⁠h Palace of Scientific Men; the Archbishop of Canterbury was in the Chair, when it was resolved unanimously, “That it is desirable that those Scientific men who believe in the truths of Religion should take every opportunity of stating that belief; and that the following be appointed a Committee wi⁠⟨⁠t⁠⟩⁠h pow⁠⟨⁠e⁠⟩⁠r to add to their number, for the p⁠⟨⁠u⁠⟩⁠rpose of maintaining communication a⁠⟨⁠mo⁠⟩⁠ng those desirous of promoting this object:— His Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury ⁠⟨⁠Prof⁠⟩⁠or Stokes, Profor Bal⁠⟨⁠fou⁠⟩⁠r Stewart, Dr Sorby, Dr Gladstone, Profor Rollestone and Profer McKendrick, Hon. Sec. Mr Walter Browne”.2 The Committee have lately been able to take advantage of an offer kindly made to them by the proprietors of the “Contemporary Review”, who propose to publish a series of articles dealing with the present state of the various Sciences.3 It is proposed to consider how far the theories in each science, without any reference to Christianity, rest on fully proved & verified laws & how far on hypotheses, ⁠⟨⁠co⁠⟩⁠njectures more or less probable; in other words how far each science has advan⁠⟨⁠ced⁠⟩⁠ ⁠⟨⁠1 or 2 words⁠⟩⁠ & assured of ⁠⟨⁠  ⁠⟩⁠ bey⁠⟨⁠ond⁠⟩⁠ ⁠⟨⁠2 or 3 words⁠⟩⁠ conclusions ma⁠⟨⁠de⁠⟩⁠ to ⁠⟨⁠  ⁠⟩⁠ rather of speculation. I am ⁠⟨⁠re⁠⟩⁠quest⁠⟨⁠ed by⁠⟩⁠ the Committee to inqui⁠⟨⁠re⁠⟩⁠ wheth⁠⟨⁠er y⁠⟩⁠ou would kindly undert⁠⟨⁠a⁠⟩⁠ke to prep⁠⟨⁠a⁠⟩⁠re an article of this char⁠⟨⁠a⁠⟩⁠cter on the Science of Comparative Anatomy. The points which it is suggested, should be specially dealt with, are the evidence on the Theory of Evolution, but of course, much would be left to your own discretion in this matter. It is prop⁠⟨⁠ose⁠⟩⁠d that the series should comme⁠⟨⁠n⁠⟩⁠ce as early next year as possible and I m⁠⟨⁠a⁠⟩⁠y add that Dr Gladstone, Dr Sorby & Profor Balfour Stewart have already consented to take part in ⁠⟨⁠this.⁠⟩⁠ The ⁠⟨⁠hon⁠⟩⁠orarium for each ⁠⟨⁠artic⁠⟩⁠le wil⁠⟨⁠l be⁠⟩⁠ £1 ⁠⟨⁠per⁠⟩⁠ page & the article sh⁠⟨⁠ould⁠⟩⁠ run ⁠⟨⁠to⁠⟩⁠ about twenty pages. It is hoped that the series may be subsequently published in a volume.4

Hoping for an early & favourable reply | I remain | Yours truly | Walter R Browne | Hon. Sec

Chas. Darwin Esqr F.R.S.

CD annotations

Top of letter: ‘Keep’ blue crayon

Footnotes

The date range is established by the relationship between this letter and the letter to W. R. Browne, 23 November 1881; the second digit of the date has been destroyed by a hole in the page.
Lambeth Palace was the London residence of the archbishop of Canterbury, Archibald Campbell Tait. The committee members were George Gabriel Stokes, Balfour Stewart, Henry Clifton Sorby, John Hall Gladstone, George Rolleston, and John Gray McKendrick.
The Contemporary Review was owned by Samuel Morley, Francis Peek, and John Brown Paton; the editor was Alexander Stuart Strahan (see Wellesley index).
The proposed series was not published in the Contemporary Review or as a separate volume.

Summary

Announces intention to hold a private conference with the Archbishop of Canterbury with the aim of encouraging men of science to reaffirm their religious beliefs and also to publish a series of articles in the Contemporary Review on the state of the various sciences.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-12789
From
Walter Raleigh Browne
To
Charles Robert Darwin
Sent from
London, Belgrave Rd, 38
Source of text
DAR 160: 334
Physical description
ALS 4pp damaged

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 12789,” accessed on 26 November 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-12789.xml

letter