skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

From R. B. Litchfield   3 February 1880

4 Bryanston Street | Portman Square. W.

3. Feb 1880

Dear Mr. Darwin,

I think Huxley’s judgmt. will be a safe one on the question of replyg. to Butler—unless it be perhaps that he is himself horribly pugnacious & wd. naturally be for fighting1

I still cannot frame to myself any answer wh wd. be of the slightest use, or logically sound, except it confine itself to a mere reitern. of what you’ve already told B. If such a reply seems any good it might be in such form as I have put down on back of this. I do think it of the most supreme importance not to allude to B.’s pretending to think you untrustworthy—and that any reply shd. be absolutely without feeling.2

Always Yrs affec. | R. B. L.

Evoln. Old & New3

Sir,

I have read the statement by Mr. S. Butler wh. appeared in yr. columns of Saty last under the above heading, as to my having omitted to mention, in the preface to the lately issued transln of Dr. Krause’s Essay on Erasmus Darwin, that his paper had been somewhat altered before being thus republished.4 As Mr. Butler quotes my letter to him in wh. I informed him that this omission was accidental, & that it shd. be corrected in case of the little book reaching a Second Edition, I do not see that I need trouble yr. readers with any further observations on the matter.5

Footnotes

In his letter of 2 February 1880, CD told Litchfield that he planned to ask Thomas Henry Huxley’s opinion on whether he should respond to accusations made by Samuel Butler in a letter to the Athenæum (see letter to T. H. Huxley, 2 February 1880). For Butler’s letter to the Athenæum, see the letter to H. E. Litchfield, 1 February [1880], enclosure 1.
CD had sent one or two versions of his draft letter to the Athenæum to Henrietta Emma Litchfield (letter to H. E. Litchfield, 1 February [1880], enclosures 2 and 3). Both the Litchfields advised CD not to respond to Butler, but also advised CD to delete some sentences from his draft if he did decide to reply (see letter from H. E. Litchfield, [1 February 1880], and letter from R. B. Litchfield, 1 February 1880).
This draft is Litchfield’s suggestion for a letter from CD to the Athenæum in response to Butler.
The translation of Ernst Krause’s essay (Krause 1879a) was the second part of Erasmus Darwin.
See letter to Samuel Butler, 3 January 1880. A second edition of Erasmus Darwin was published in 1887, after CD’s death (Erasmus Darwin 2d ed.). The following note was added to the preface: ‘[Mr. Darwin accidentally omitted to mention that Dr. Krause revised, and made certain additions to, his Essay before it was translated. Among these additions is an allusion to Mr. Butler’s book, ‘Evolution, Old and New.’]’ (ibid., p. iv).

Bibliography

Erasmus Darwin 2d ed.: The life of Erasmus Darwin. By Charles Darwin. Being an introduction to an essay on his scientific works. By Ernst Krause. Translated from the German by W. S. Dallas. 2d edition. London: John Murray. 1887.

Erasmus Darwin. By Ernst Krause. Translated from the German by W. S. Dallas, with a preliminary notice by Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1879.

Krause, Ernst. 1879a. Erasmus Darwin, der Großvater und Vorkämpfer Charles Darwin’s: ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Descendenz-Theorie. Kosmos 4 (1878–9): 397–424.

Summary

Thinks Huxley’s judgment on answering S. Butler’s charges would be trustworthy, though THH is horribly pugnacious and would naturally be for fighting.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-12456
From
Richard Buckley Litchfield
To
Charles Robert Darwin
Sent from
London, Bryanston St, 4
Source of text
DAR 92: B79–80
Physical description
ALS 5pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 12456,” accessed on 26 November 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-12456.xml

letter