To Charles Bradlaugh 6 June 1877
June 6 77
Sir
I am much obliged for your courteous notice.1 I have been for many years much out of health & have been forced to give up all Society or public meetings, & it would be great suffering to me to be be a witness in a court.— It is indeed not improbable that I might be unable to attend. Therefore I hope that if in your power you will excuse my attendance. I may add that I am not a medical man. I have not seen the book in question, but from notices in the newspapers, I suppose that it refers to means to prevent conception.2 If so I shd be forced to express in court a very decided opinion in opposition to you, & Mrs Besant; though from all that I have heard I do not doubt that both of you are acting solely in accordance to what you believe best for mankind.— I have long held an opposite opinion, as you will see in the enclosed extract, & this I shd. think it my duty to state in court. When the words “any means” were written of artificial means of preventing conception.3 But besides the evil here alluded to I believe that any such practices would in time spread to unmarried women & wd destroy chastity, on which the family bond depends; & the weakening of this bond would be the greatest of all possible evils to mankind; In conclusion I shd likewise think it my duty to state in Court; so that my judgment, would be in the strongest opposition to yours.,
On Friday the 8th I leave home for a month & my address for the 8th to … will be at my sisters house & from the 13th at my sons house, BS.4
If it is not asking too great a favour, I shd be greatly obliged if you wd inform me what you decide; as apprehension of the coming exertion would prevent the rest which I receive doing me much good. Apologising for the length of this letter. | Sir your obedient | C. R D.
Footnotes
Bibliography
Brodie, Janet Farrell. 1994. Contraception and abortion in nineteenth-century America. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Descent 2d ed.: The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. By Charles Darwin. 2d edition. London: John Murray. 1874.
Knowlton, Charles. 1832. Fruits of philosophy, or, the private companion of young married people. New York: n.p.
Knowlton, Charles. 1877. Fruits of philosophy: an essay on the population question. London: Freethought Publishing Company.
Summary
CD would prefer not to be a witness in court. In any case CD’s opinion is strongly opposed to that of CB and Annie Besant. Has read only notices of their book [Charles Knowlton, Fruits of philosophy, with preface by the publishers A. Besant and C. Bradlaugh (1877)] but believes artificial checks to the natural rate of human increase are very undesirable and that the use of artificial means to prevent conception would soon destroy chastity and, ultimately, the family.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-10988
- From
- Charles Robert Darwin
- To
- Charles Bradlaugh
- Sent from
- Down
- Source of text
- DAR 202: 32
- Physical description
- ADraftS 2pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 10988,” accessed on 26 September 2022, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-10988.xml