Thanks for his memoir ["On the appendicular skeleton of the Primates"].
Has asked gentlemen who administer chloroform to make observations [on expression?] for CD.
Langstaff has never seen the platysma act, and he believes it to be rudimentary in humans.
Thanks Charles Langstaff for his observations relating to expression. Has requested observations on the platysma. Discusses the actions of other facial muscles, especially during crying. [Encloses 5828.]
Answers CD's queries on sexual characters and differences among the Urodela.
Is interested in the relationship of pectoral and pelvic limbs in man and apes and has looked at reptiles and amphibians to find traces of the earlier conditions of the limbs.
Asks whether CD knows any instances of deformities or pathological conditions occurring simultaneously in both sets of limbs.
Anticipates that all their differences are fated to find expression in projected book on man.
Offers his early MS with useful references related to the distribution of animals. Hopes ARW's book will not be "little".
Will not be returning to London for a week; writes to save CD's calling.
Thanks WHF for his very good lecture.
On amount of modification and lines of descent in determining the position in man.
Reference to StGJM's article "On the appendicular skeleton of the primates" Phil. Trans. R. Soc. [157 (1867): 299-430],
and his [and James Murie's] article on lemurs ["On the anatomy of Lemuroidea"] Trans. Zool. Soc. [7 (1872): 1-114].
Is not prepared to express an opinion on man's origin. On pure anatomical grounds he would form a family of the higher division of the primates, but if man's intellectual, moral, and religious nature is considered, then "he differs more from an Anthropoid Ape than such an Ape differs from a lump of granite".
Darwin Correspondence Project
darwin@lib.cam.ac.uk
© University of Cambridge 2022
Website by Surface Impression
© 2024 University of Cambridge