To J. D. Hooker 22 July [1879]1
Down, | Beckenham, Kent. | Railway Station | Orpington. S.E.R.
July 22d
My dear Hooker
If my memory serves me rightly Dyer has left Kew for his holidays, & so I write to you to ask you if by any chance you have seeds of Lathyrus aphaca or any young seedlings 2 or 3 of which could be potted.2 If I receive no answer I shall understand that you cannot aid me.— I want to try whether the tendrils are apheliotropic, for I record that they revolve very little, I conjecture that they may find a support by bending towards any dark object.—3
Our book on the movements of Plants will, I think, contain a good deal of new matter, but will be intolerably dull.4 I have been working pretty hard of late & want rest & change, so we all go on August 1st to Coniston for a month.5 It is an awful journey to me.— It is a long time since I have heard any news of you & yours, & what you are doing & intending to do. Frank comes back in the beginning of next month from Würzburg, where he has been working pretty hard on various subjects & practising dissection, cutting slices &c.—6
I have just read Balls’ essay. It is pretty bold. The rapid development, as far as we can judge, of all the higher plants within recent geological times is an abominable mystery. Certainly it wd be a great step if we could believe that the higher plants at first could live only at a high level; but until it is experimentally that Cycadeæ, Ferns &c can withstand much more carbonic acid than the higher plants, the hypothesis seems to me far too rash.7 Saporta believes that there was an astonishingly rapid development of the higher plants, as soon flower-frequenting insects were developed & favoured intercrossing.8 I shd. like to see this whole problem solved.
I have fancied that perhaps there was during long ages a small isolated continent in the S. hemisphere, which served as the birth place of the higher plants; but this is a wretchedly poor conjecture. It is odd that Ball does not allude to the obvious fact that there must have been alpine plants before the Glacial period, many of which wd have returned to the mountains after the glacial period when the climate again became warm. I always accounted to myself in this manner for the Gentians &c.—
Ball ought also to have considered the Alpine insects common to the Arctic regions. I do not know how it may be with you, but my faith in the Glacial migration is not at all shaken.9
Ever my dear old friend yours truly | Ch. Darwin
P.S. I shall have to return some plants to Kew when we leave home.— Your plant of Smilax aspera has been injured by scale insects which were only lately detected.—10 Is this worth returning? It is a large bush.
Footnotes
Bibliography
Ball, John. 1879. On the origin of the flora of the European Alps. [Read 9 June 1879.] Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society and Monthly Record of Geography 1: 564–89.
Movement in plants: The power of movement in plants. By Charles Darwin. Assisted by Francis Darwin. London: John Murray. 1880.
Origin: On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1859.
Saporta, Gaston de. 1878a. Les anciens climats de l’Europe et le développement de la végétation: conférence donnée au Congrès de l’Association française pour l’avancement des sciences, tenu au Hâvre en août 1877. Aix-en-Provence: Marius Illy.
Summary
At work on Movement in plants.
Discusses John Ball’s, G. de Saporta’s, and his own theories of higher plant origin. Their rapid development remains an "abominable mystery".
Frank is working in Würzburg.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-12167
- From
- Charles Robert Darwin
- To
- Joseph Dalton Hooker
- Sent from
- Down
- Source of text
- DAR 95: 485–8
- Physical description
- ALS 7pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 12167,” accessed on 5 November 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-12167.xml