Search:
3 Items
Page: 1
From Daniel Oliver 27 February 1863
Summary
Answers CD’s query on Primula longiflora and P. scotica.
Would like abstract of CD’s paper ["Two forms of Linum", Collected papers 2: 93–105] for Natural History Review.
Author: | Daniel Oliver |
Addressee: | Charles Robert Darwin |
Date: | 27 Feb 1863 |
Classmark: | DAR 108: 178 |
Letter no: | DCP-LETT-4015 |
From Daniel Oliver 17 February 1863
Summary
DO thinks an essay [Alexander Braun’s "Rejuvenescence", Ray Society (1853)] is not worth reading with respect to some difficulty concerning phyllotaxy.
Author: | Daniel Oliver |
Addressee: | Charles Robert Darwin |
Date: | 17 Feb 1863 |
Classmark: | DAR 173: 20 |
Letter no: | DCP-LETT-8770 |
To Daniel Oliver 20 [February 1863]
Summary
Having trouble understanding laws of phyllotaxy in order to grasp Hugh Falconer’s objections.
L. C. Treviranus on Primula [see 3980] misses the "prettiness" of the adaptations.
John Scott says P. scotica is never dimorphic.
Author: | Charles Robert Darwin |
Addressee: | Daniel Oliver |
Date: | 20 [Feb 1863] |
Classmark: | DAR 261.10: 41 (EH 88206024) |
Letter no: | DCP-LETT-4052 |
Author
Oliver, Daniel | (2) |
Darwin, C. R. | (1) |
Addressee
Darwin, C. R. | (2) |
Oliver, Daniel | (1) |