skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To W. G. Kemp   11 November [1874]

Down, | Beckenham, Kent.

Nov. 11th

Dear Sir

I am obliged by your note.1

I agree with you that the reproductive system of natural species must have been in some way modified in correlation with the variation which they have undergone. But why has not a single domestic var. of an animal or plant, many of which have been profoundly modified, been rendered mutually sterile?2

Until this can be answered, it cannot be said that we know anything definitely.

As I have said I suspect that the difference is due to organisms in a state of nature having been exposed for long periods to much more uniform conditions, than are those under domestication.—3

Dear Sir | Yours faithfully | Ch. Darwin

Footnotes

Kemp’s letter has not been found.
Sterility had long been regarded as a test of true species, and Thomas Henry Huxley had coined the term ‘physiological species’ to refer to a definition of species based on reproductive barriers between life-forms (T. H. Huxley 1863, pp. 106–8). CD had investigated cases of intra-specific sterility, especially in plants. He had come to believe that most plants were adapted to promote the intercrossing of distinct individuals (see, for example, ‘Illegitimate offspring of dimorphic and trimorphic plants’). CD had discussed differences in wild and domestic animals and plants and the fertility of domestic varieties with their wild progenitors in Variation.
See Variation 2: 190–1.

Bibliography

Huxley, Thomas Henry. 1863a. Evidence as to man’s place in nature. London: Williams & Norgate.

‘Illegitimate offspring of dimorphic and trimorphic plants’: On the character and hybrid-like nature of the offspring from the illegitimate unions of dimorphic and trimorphic plants. By Charles Darwin. [Read 20 February 1868.] Journal of the Linnean Society of London (Botany) 10 (1869): 393–437.

Variation: The variation of animals and plants under domestication. By Charles Darwin. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 1868.

Summary

Responds to the correspondent's comments on natural selection.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-9716F
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Walter Gustav Kemp
Sent from
Down
Postmark
NO 11 | 74
Source of text
West Berkshire Museum, Newbury (NEBYM:1986.63.1.1)
Physical description
ALS 2pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 9716F,” accessed on 19 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-9716F.xml

letter