To W. G. Kemp 11 November [1874]
Down, | Beckenham, Kent.
Nov. 11th
Dear Sir
I am obliged by your note.1
I agree with you that the reproductive system of natural species must have been in some way modified in correlation with the variation which they have undergone. But why has not a single domestic var. of an animal or plant, many of which have been profoundly modified, been rendered mutually sterile?2
Until this can be answered, it cannot be said that we know anything definitely.
As I have said I suspect that the difference is due to organisms in a state of nature having been exposed for long periods to much more uniform conditions, than are those under domestication.—3
Dear Sir | Yours faithfully | Ch. Darwin
Footnotes
Bibliography
Huxley, Thomas Henry. 1863a. Evidence as to man’s place in nature. London: Williams & Norgate.
‘Illegitimate offspring of dimorphic and trimorphic plants’: On the character and hybrid-like nature of the offspring from the illegitimate unions of dimorphic and trimorphic plants. By Charles Darwin. [Read 20 February 1868.] Journal of the Linnean Society of London (Botany) 10 (1869): 393–437.
Variation: The variation of animals and plants under domestication. By Charles Darwin. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 1868.
Summary
Responds to the correspondent's comments on natural selection.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-9716F
- From
- Charles Robert Darwin
- To
- Walter Gustav Kemp
- Sent from
- Down
- Postmark
- NO 11 | 74
- Source of text
- West Berkshire Museum, Newbury (NEBYM:1986.63.1.1)
- Physical description
- ALS 2pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 9716F,” accessed on 19 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-9716F.xml