To George Bentham 15 December [1857]1
Down Bromley Kent
Dec. 15th.—
My dear Sir
I am in truth ashamed to trouble you so soon again; but since I sent you the list of Silene, I find that I very stupidly overlooked a list of Cucubalus, which I had forgotten that Gærtner ranked as quite distinct genus.—2
I have now copied a list in pairs of the crosses which he made in Cucubalus, & it would be a very great kindness, if you would look it over & mark whether in each pair, you consider the male & female as only varieties of the same species or as distinct species, & allow me to state that such is your opinion.—3
My object is to show that where the fertility of a cross makes a very close approach to perfect fertility there is often difference of opinion whether the forms are varieties or species. If any of the pairs are undoubtedly good & distinct species, the case does not concern me. If this would not cause you much trouble, it wd be a great kindness, for I have already got a curious parallel list of graduated evidence from fertility & ordinary evidence on what to call species and what varieties.—
My dear Sir | Yours very sincerely | C. Darwin
Footnotes
Bibliography
Natural selection: Charles Darwin’s Natural selection: being the second part of his big species book written from 1856 to 1858. Edited by R. C. Stauffer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1975.
Summary
For his studies on fertility of crosses, asks GB to mark a list of pairs of Cucubalus as to whether they are varieties of the same species, or distinct species.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-2184
- From
- Charles Robert Darwin
- To
- George Bentham
- Sent from
- Down
- Source of text
- Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (Bentham Correspondence, Vol. 3, Daintree–Dyer, 1830–1884, GEB/1/3: f. 681
- Physical description
- ALS 3pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 2184,” accessed on 18 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-2184.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 6