skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To Ernst Krause   29 January 1881

Down, | Beckenham, Kent. | (Railway Station | Orpington. S.E.R.)

Jan. 29th 1881

My dear Sir

I send by this post a copy of Nature with your letter, which has been very well translated by Mr Balfour.—1 The letter seems to me in every way excellent.— It says everything which I wished to be said & not a word which I would wish unsaid. I thank you cordially. I shall now feel easy, & Mr. Butler may abuse me to his heart’s content.2

Yours faithfully & gratefully | Charles Darwin

P.S | You will see a long review of Mr Butler’s book by Mr. Romanes.3 It seems to me very well done, but all my family think that he has used too strong language, & perhaps this is the case.—

Mr Butler’s vanity is a real psychological curiosity.—

Footnotes

CD had asked Francis Maitland Balfour to translate Krause’s response to Samuel Butler; it was published as a letter to Nature dated 12 January 1881, and appeared in the issue for 27 January 1881, p. 288 (see letter to F. M. Balfour, 12 January 1881).
For Butler’s attack on CD, see Butler 1880, pp. 58–62, and the letter to Leslie Stephen, 11 January 1881 and n. 3.
George John Romanes’s review of Butler 1880 appeared in Nature, 27 January 1881, pp. 285–7.

Bibliography

Butler, Samuel. 1880. Unconscious memory: a comparison between the theory of Dr. Ewald Hering, … and the ‘Philosophy of the unconscious’ of Dr. Edward von Hartmann. London: David Bogue.

Summary

Sends copy of Nature in which EK’s letter, translated by Balfour, is printed. Thanks him. Now feels easy.

G. J. Romanes’ language in his review of Butler’s book [Unconscious memory] is perhaps too strong. Butler’s vanity is a "real psychological curiosity".

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-13032
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Ernst Ludwig (Ernst) Krause
Sent from
Down
Source of text
The Huntington Library (HM 36213)
Physical description
ALS 2pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 13032,” accessed on 19 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-13032.xml

letter