skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To T. H. Huxley   5 November 1880

Down, | Beckenham, Kent. | (Railway Station | Orpington. S.E.R.)

Nov. 5th 80

My dear Huxley

On reading over your excellent review with the sentence quoted from Sir W. Thomson, it seemed to me adviseable, considering the nature of the publication, to notice “extreme variation” & another point.—1 Now will you read the enclosed, & if you approve, post it soon. If you disapprove, throw it in the fire, & thus add one more to the 1000 kindnesses which you have done me.— Do not write; I shall see result in next week’s Nature.—2 Please observe that in the foul copy I had added a final sentence which I did not at first copy, as it seemed to me inferentially too contemptuous; but I have now pinned it to back, & you can send it or not,—as you think best,—that is if you think any part worth sending.3 My request will not cost you much trouble, i.e to read two pages, for I know that you can decide at once.—

I heartily enjoyed my talk with you on Sunday Morning4

Ever yours | Ch. Darwin

If my M.S. appears too flat, too contemptuous, too spiteful, or too anything, I earnestly beseech you to throw it into the fire

Footnotes

Charles Wyville Thomson had claimed that the results of the Challenger expedition failed ‘to give the least support to the theory which refers the evolution of species to extreme variation guided only by natural selection’ (C. W. Thomson 1880, p. 50). Huxley’s review of C. W. Thomson 1880 was published in Nature, 4 November 1880, pp. 1–3.
The enclosure has not been found; see, however, letter to Nature, 5 November 1880.
The additional sentence was omitted from CD’s letter to Nature by Huxley (see letter from T. H. Huxley, 14 November 1880); it was published, however, in ML 1: 389: Perhaps it would have been wiser on my part to have remained quite silent like the breeder; for as Prof. Sedgwick remarked many years ago, in reference to the poor old Dean of York who was never weary of inveighing against geologists, a man who talks about what he does not in the least understand, is invulnerable. CD alludes to a controversy in 1844 between Adam Sedgwick and William Cockburn, the dean of York (see M. Roberts 2009, pp. 164–5).
CD was in London from 29 October to 2 November 1881 (‘Journal’ (Appendix II)); in 1881, the Sunday before 5 November was 31 October.

Bibliography

ML: More letters of Charles Darwin: a record of his work in a series of hitherto unpublished letters. Edited by Francis Darwin and Albert Charles Seward. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 1903.

Roberts, Michael. 2009. Adam Sedgwick (1785–1873): geologist and evangelical. In Geology and religion: a history of harmony and hostility. Edited by M. Kölbl-Ebert. London: The Geological Society.

Thomson, Charles Wyville. 1880. General introduction to the zoological series of reports. In Report on the scientific results of the voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Volume 1 (Zoology). Prepared by C. Wyville Thomson. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

Summary

Has read THH’s review of Sir Wyville Thomson’s [Introduction to the] Voyage of the "Challenger".

Sends a draft of a letter for Nature [Collected papers 2: 223–4]. He particularly asks THH to decide whether he should include a certain paragraph [see ML 1: 389].

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-12796
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Thomas Henry Huxley
Sent from
Down
Source of text
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Archives (Huxley 5: 344)
Physical description
ALS 4pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 12796,” accessed on 19 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-12796.xml

letter