skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To A. A. W. Hubrecht   25 August 1879

Down, | Beckenham, Kent. | (Railway Station | Orpington. S.E.R.) [Waterhead Hotel, Coniston.]

Aug. 25th 1879

Dear Sir

I am much obliged for your extremely courteous letter, together with your Essay & published papers.1 Permit me to remark that you write excellent English—

It is well to try all sorts of hypotheses, but I do not feel inclined at present to place much trust in that suggested by you. Is not very long life rather rare with the Invertebrata? Considering that there would be no difference at first in structure, habits, or habitation between the first & last born offspring of any species, would they not be extremely liable to intercross,—for instance the children of the first born with the second born &c? According to your theory trees, some of which live for 1000–3000 years, would be particularly liable to have left first-born modified & later-born unmodified progeny; & is there any reason to believe that this has occurred?

In all cases it seems to me probable that the more highly modified & better adapted first-born progeny would displace & exterminate the less modified.

But as I have said it is well to consider all hypotheses, & with sincere good wishes for the success of your investigations, I remain | Dear Sir | Yours faithfully | Charles Darwin

Footnotes

The letter from Hubrecht has not been found. Hubrecht probably sent a draft of his essay ‘De hypothese der versnelde ontwikkeling door eerstgeboorte en hare plaats in de evolutieleer’ (The hypothesis of accelerated development by primogeniture and its place in the theory of evolution; Hubrecht 1882) and his publications on Nemertea (the phylum of ribbon worms). Hubrecht 1882 was translated into English and published in Nature, 18 January 1883, pp. 279–81, and 25 January 1883, pp. 301–4. Hubrecht had argued that the first born of sexual generations were the principal variants and source of new species, while the last born were the representatives of stability. For a contemporary critique of the theory, see Minot 1883.

Bibliography

Hubrecht, Ambrosius Arnold Willem. 1882. De hypothese der versnelde ontwikkeling door eerstgeboorte en hare plaats in de evolutieleer. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

Minot, Charles Sedgwick. 1883. Criticism of Professor Hubrecht’s hypothesis of development by primogeniture. Science 6: 165–6.

Summary

Thanks for essay. Doubts AAWH’s theory concerning modifications in first- and last-born offspring.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-12200
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Ambrosius Arnold Willem Hubrecht
Sent from
Coniston Down letterhead
Source of text
Hubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Research
Physical description
ALS 3pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 12200,” accessed on 24 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-12200.xml

letter