skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

From W. H. Flower   12 April 1878

Royal College of Surgeons of England | Lincolns Inn Fields (WC)

12 day of April 1878

My dear Mr Darwin

I am exceedingly sorry that I should have given you the trouble of writing again about the goose’s wing—but it came to me just as I was beginning a course of Lectures which occupied very much time.—1

When they were over I went into the Country for a week, and since I came back I have had a quantity of arrears to fetch up. In the meanwhile the wing has been macerating in water, and only just got into a condition soft enough to enable me to examine it properly

I send you a sketch of the malformation (if it can be so called) on the back of Mr Blairs Letter.2

The bones are all perfectly normal but the digits (with the large primary feathers) were in the dried state of the wing abnormally flexed upon the metacarpus at the metacarpo-phalangeal joint   Normally these bones would be in a straight line with one another— There is nothing in the bones to account for this and when softened there is no difficulty in replacing them in the natural position   The malformation of the bones was probably due to want of balance in the contractile power of opposing muscles & is analogous to club-foot in man.3

Supposing this view is correct (and it ought to be verified by dissections of the muscles and tendons in a recent state in several specimens) it is interesting in connection with the history, as although the particular injury of the parent has not reproduced itself in the offspring—it may probably have led to some disturbance in the functions of the nerves which control the muscles of the same region in this case. Of course this seems very far fetched: but unless it is a mere coincidence it is the only way in which I can account for the circumstance

Before saying more I should like to have several of the wings, especially of very young birds, examined to see whether the condition was the same in all, or whether congenital, or acquired after birth. The wing of the original goose ought also to be examined and described to make the story complete. I think that on the whole it is worth following up—

Believe me | Yours very truly | W H Flower

W. H. Flower

Footnotes

See letter to W. H. Flower, 11 April 1878. Flower was the Hunterian Professor of comparative anatomy and physiology at the Royal College of Surgeons, and responsible for delivering lecture courses on annually varying subjects; between 1877 and 1880 he lectured on the comparative anatomy of humans (Cornish 1904, p. 106).
Reuben Almond Blair’s letter with Flower’s sketch on the back has not been found.
Blair had suggested that the malformed goose wing might show the inheritance of the effects of injury (see Correspondence vol. 25, letter to R. A. Blair, 27 December 1877).

Bibliography

Cornish, Charles J. 1904. Sir William Henry Flower ... A personal memoir. London: Macmillan and Co.

Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.

Summary

Bones in goose’s wing perfectly normal. Malformation probably due to want of balance in muscles; analogous to club-foot. Injury of the parent not reproduced in offspring, but may have led to disturbance in functions of nerves which control muscles. Would like further study.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-11471
From
William Henry Flower
To
Charles Robert Darwin
Sent from
Royal College of Surgeons
Source of text
American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.534)
Physical description
ALS 4pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 11471,” accessed on 23 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-11471.xml

letter