skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

From Ernst Krause   11 March 1877

The kind permission you gave Professor Haeckel that the Biological Journal with the editorship of which he intrusted me, might make its appearance in the world under the victorious banner of your celebrated name, adds to the admiration I always felt for your discoveries the sentiments of deepest thankfulness for the granting of so signal a favour. It shall be my most earnest endeavour that the German Journal under your protection prosper to give you joy as soon as it has overcome the manifold impediments of the outset.1 The editors of the new periodical would be grateful if you would in any way kindly give them hints or directions or—is it not too temerary to utter any such wishes?—if you occasionally disposed in our favour of some article or aphoristic thought pointing out perhaps some new particularly important field for observation, or any contribution in any shape. Perhaps you are accustomed from time to time to commit notes to some English periodical; if this be the case I should venture the humble demand that you would render it accessible to us and authorise us at the same to reproduce them. The same desire I dare express in reference to the publications of your sons in the field of natural science where they have already given so telling signs of being to follow up the great traditions of your family.2

You might, most honoured Sir, ask with some astonishment what encourages so bold wishes in a correspondent as yet unknown unto you? nothing but the entire devotion which for many years past he has been consecrating to the work of reformation begun by you. I was among the few who first united to smooth the path to the evangely of intellectual deliverance come from England. As early as in 1866 I published a work on genealogical botany in which I strove to show that in the vegetable kingdom too there can be traced a pedigree however deeply branched.3 The indifference, though, with which among us in Germany botanists heedlessly look on the accomplishing scientific revolution caused the book to pass without producing an appreciable effect. Ever since I have been doing my best in periodicals of every description to gain over disciples to the manner of viewing things reconised by you, as well as to refute opponents. Two years ago yielding to the pressure of my publisher I even went as far as trying to open unto larger numbers of readers a view in general outlines of the newly won conception of the universe and beg to join this attempt hoping for your receiving it with kind indulgence.4

You will in all likelihood, most honoured Sir, find strange that though having for years been given up to propagating the results and method of your investigations I should so long have foregone giving utterance by letter to the high admiration they struck me with. Without any regret on the account of this omission I may say that it was solely motivated by regard for your time and the conviction that nobody ought less than you to be deprived of any part of leisure by correspondance. My now departing from this well considered principle I trust you will kindly grant in behalf of the young enterprise so wholly depending on your continued benevolence; nothing in fact can more further “the Kosmos” than your agreeing to look on it as an intellectual tie realising your own live connexion with the exceedingly vast number of your admirers in Germany.

With the expression of an illimited veneration and the wish that these lines may find you in best health

I am, Sir, | Yours | respectfully | Ernst Krause

Berlin, N.O. Friedenstrasse | No. 10. | 11.3.77.

Footnotes

Ernst Haeckel wrote to CD on 30 December 1876 (Correspondence vol. 24), asking him whether he would agree to put his name to a new journal, Kosmos. The subtitle was: Zeitschrift für einheitliche Weltanschauung auf Grund der Entwickelungslehre in Verbindung mit Charles Darwin und Ernst Haeckel (Journal for uniform worldview based on the theory of development in connection with Charles Darwin and Ernst Haeckel). The editors were Krause, Otto Caspari, and Gustav Jäger. Otto Zacharias had served as editor in the planning stages but Haeckel did not want him to be part of the editorial board (see letter from Otto Zacharias, 23 February 1877); for more on the founding of the journal, see Daum 1998, pp. 359–69.
CD’s sons George Howard and Francis Darwin had published several scientific articles, including G. H. Darwin 1875, 1876b, and 1877, and F. Darwin 1875a, 1876a, 1876b, and 1877a.
Die botanische Systematik in ihrem Verhältniss zur Morphologie (Botanical systematics in relation to morphology; Krause 1866).
Under the pseudonym Carus Sterne, Krause had published Werden und Vergehen: eine Entwicklungsgeschichte des Naturganzen in gemeinverständlicher Fassung (Genesis and decline: a history of the whole of nature in popular form; Sterne 1876). CD’s copy is in the Darwin Library–CUL.

Bibliography

Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.

Darwin, Francis. 1875a. On the primary vascular dilatation in acute inflammation. Journal of Anatomy and Physiology 10 (1875–6): 1–16.

Darwin, Francis. 1876a. On the structure of the snail’s heart. Journal of Anatomy and Physiology 10: 506–10.

Darwin, Francis. 1876b. The process of aggregation in the tentacles of Drosera rotundifolia. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 16: 309–19.

Darwin, Francis. 1877a. On the protrusion of protoplasmic filaments from the glandular hairs of the common teasel (Dipsacus sylvestris). (Abstract.) [Read 1 March 1877.] Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 26: 4–8.

Darwin, George Howard. 1875a. Marriages between first cousins in England and their effects. [Read 16 March 1875.] Journal of the Statistical Society of London 38: 153–84.

Darwin, George Howard. 1876b. On the influence of geological changes on the earth’s axis of rotation. [Read 23 November 1876.] Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 167 (1877): 271–312.

Darwin, George Howard. 1877. On a suggested explanation of the obliquity of planets to their orbits. Philosophical Magazine 5th ser. 3: 188–92.

Daum, Andreas W. 1998. Wissenschaftspopularisierung im 19. Jahrhundert: bürgerliche Kultur, naturwissenschaftliche Bildung und die deutsche Offentlichkeit, 1848–1914. Munich: R. Oldenbourg.

Krause, Ernst. 1866. Die botanische Systematik in ihrem Verhältniss zur Morphologie: kritische Vergleichung der wichtigsten älteren Pflanzensysteme, nebst Vorschlägen zu einem natürlichen Pflanzensysteme nach morphologischen Grundsätzen, den Fachgelehrten zur Beurtheilung vorgelegt. Weimar: Bernhard Friedrich Voigt.

Sterne, Carus, pseud. (Ernst Krause.) 1876. Werden und Vergehen: eine Entwicklungsgeschichte des Naturganzen in gemeinverstädlicher Fassung. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger.

Summary

As editor of the new journal, Kosmos, thanks CD for the permission he has granted Ernst Haeckel to publish with CD’s approval.

Cites his long support for evolution as exemplified by his book [Die botanische Systematik in ihrem Verhältniss zur Morphologie (1866)].

CD has many German supporters.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-10888
From
Ernst Ludwig (Ernst) Krause
To
Charles Robert Darwin
Sent from
Berlin
Source of text
DAR 169: 105
Physical description
LS 4pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 10888,” accessed on 19 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-10888.xml

letter