skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To R. D. Fitzgerald   16 July 1875

Down, | Beckenham, Kent. | Railway Station | Orpington. S.E.R.

July 16. 75

Dear Sir

Owing to Mr Russell not having found my proper address & his subsequent absence on the Continent, I received the present of your magnificent work with its excellent illustrations, only about a week ago.1 I have now read it with much interest, & am astonished that such a work could have been prepared at Sydney. I have been particularly interested by your account of the movements of Pterostylis & Caladenia.2 Do you think it possible that the calli on the labellum are gnawed or sucked by insects?3 A careful examination of the flowers from which the pollinia have been removed by insects, would be well worth making. I daresay you have seen a good paper on the former genus in a late vol of the N. Zealand Institute.4 I have been even more interested about the closed flowers of Thelymitra, as the case is closely analogous to the equally inaccessible one of the Bee Ophrys in Europe.5 I suppose you have few coadjutors, but it would be well to ascertain whether the flowers are closed during years when the seasons are very different, & in all parts of the plant’s range. I will venture to make one other suggestion; viz with sterile species like Dendrobium hillii to try the effects of pollen taken from a distinct seedling plant, in accordance with the observations of Fritz Müller.6 I have found it almost necessary to observe insects at work to understand the meaning of the parts in orchids & on this head I see that you are a disbeliever.7 From not having been able to act in this manner I blundered about Cypripedium;8 but I do not think I have erred about the nectary of Angræcum, & Wallace has given the case of a sphinx with proboscis of sufficient length.9

With my best thanks & good wishes for your future success | I remain dear Sir | Yours faithfully | Ch. Darwin

Footnotes

CD had received the first part of Fitzgerald’s Australian orchids (Fitzgerald 1875–94). See letters to Mr Russell, 26 June [1875] and 12 July 1875.
Fitzgerald described the genus Pterostylis, with illustrations of P. longifolia (tall greenhood) and P. baptistii (king greenhood), and the genus Caladenia (spider orchid) with an illustration of C. dimorpha (Fitzgerald 1875–94, vol. 1, part 1).
The ‘calli’ are glands on the labellum. CD had cited observations by Hermann Crüger of bees gnawing the labellum in orchids (see Origin 4th ed., pp. 230–1, ‘Fertilization of orchids’, p. 154 (Collected papers 2: 151), and Orchids 2d ed., p. 270.
The closed flowers of Thelymitra carnea (the pink sun orchid) were described in the introductory essay to Fitzgerald 1875–94, vol. 1, part 1: 1. The self-fertile bee ophrys (Ophrys apifera) presented a challenge to CD’s general argument that orchids were adapted for crossing between different individuals (see Orchids, pp. 63–72).
Fitzgerald observed that a specimen of Dendrobium hillii (now Dendrobium speciosum var. hillii; the king orchid) with around 40,000 flowers produced no seed (see Fitzgerald 1875–94, vol. 1, part 1: 2.) Fritz Müller determined that in some orchids pollen from the same plant was impotent or even harmful, whereas pollen from another plant produced seed (see Variation 2: 134–5, F. Müller 1868, and Correspondence vol. 15, letter from Fritz Müller, 1 January 1867).
Fitzgerald had expressed reservations about some of CD’s remarks on insect agency in Orchids; for example, ‘Mr. Darwin seems to me to lay rather too much stress on the action of large insects seeking honey by the aid of a proboscis, as agents of fertilization’ (Fitzgerald 1875–94, vol. 1, part 1: 2).
On Cypripedium (the lady’s-slipper orchid), see Orchids 2d ed., pp. 229–31
CD had described Angraecum sesquipedale (the Christmas star orchid) in Orchids, pp. 197–203, remarking that there must be moths with probosces ten or eleven inches long to reach the base of its long nectary. Alfred Russel Wallace had supported CD’s view with an illustration of a hypothetical sphinx moth (see Wallace 1867 and Correspondence vol. 15, letter to A. R. Wallace, 12 and 13 October [1867]).

Bibliography

Cheeseman, Thomas Frederick. 1872. On the fertilization of the New Zealand species of Pterostylis. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute 5: 352–7.

Collected papers: The collected papers of Charles Darwin. Edited by Paul H. Barrett. 2 vols. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. 1977.

Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 29 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.

‘Fertilization of orchids’: Notes on the fertilization of orchids. By Charles Darwin. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 4th ser. 4 (1869): 141–59. [Collected papers 2: 138–56.]

Fitzgerald, Robert David. 1875–94. Australian orchids. 2 vols. Sydney: Thomas Richards.

Orchids 2d ed.: The various contrivances by which orchids are fertilised by insects. By Charles Darwin. 2d edition, revised. London: John Murray. 1877.

Orchids: On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects, and on the good effects of intercrossing. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1862.

Origin 4th ed.: On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. 4th edition, with additions and corrections. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1866.

Variation: The variation of animals and plants under domestication. By Charles Darwin. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 1868.

Summary

Thanks RDF for a part of his book [Australian orchids, vol. 1 (1875–82)]; suggests further observations RDF could make and defends some of his own conclusions.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-10069
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Robert David Fitzgerald
Sent from
Down
Source of text
Mitchell Library, Sydney (A 2546)
Physical description
LS 4pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 10069,” accessed on 20 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-10069.xml

Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 23

letter