To Benjamin Collins Brodie 26 April [1859]1
Down Bromley Kent
Ap. 26th
Dear Sir Benjamin Brodie
In answer to your note, I cannot think of any Zoologist who has any especial claim for the Royal Medal.2 Though not a Botanist myself, it seems to me that Mr Bentham has high claims for this honour. His contributions to De Candolles great Prodromus, almost by itself shows his European reputation as a systematic Botanist:3 & many of his memoirs, as I can speak from my own knowledge, contain much important information on Classification, Distribution & such general subjects.—
Should the Council think of a geologist, to the best of my judgment, Mr Prestwich4 amply deserves a medal, for his remarkable & excellent labours on the British Tertiary formations, & their correlation with those on the continent. I am tempted to add that it would be a facility in thinking over the medals if any list of the names of individuals existed to whom the medals of all kinds have been given: it would aid in apportioning the medals fairly for different subjects.—
With much respect pray believe me | Yours sincerely | C. Darwin
Footnotes
Bibliography
Candolle, Augustin Pyramus de and Candolle, Alphonse de. 1824–73. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, sive enumeratio contracta ordinum generum specierumque plantarum huc usque cognitarum, juxta methodi naturalis normas digesta. 19 vols. Paris: Treuttel & Würtz [and others].
Jackson, Benjamin Daydon. 1906. George Bentham. London: J. M. Dent. New York: E. P. Dutton.
Summary
CD suggests George Bentham or Joseph Prestwich for Royal Medal.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-2454F
- From
- Charles Robert Darwin
- To
- Benjamin Collins Brodie, Sr, 1st baronet
- Sent from
- Down
- Source of text
- The Royal Society
- Physical description
- ? 2pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 2454F,” accessed on 20 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-2454F.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 18 (Supplement)