skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To J. D. Hooker   28 January [1859]

Down Bromley Kent

Jan. 28th

My dear Hooker

Thanks about Glaciers. It is a pleasure & profit to me to write to you, & as in your last you have touched on naturalised plants of Australia, I suppose you would not dislike to hear what I can say in answer. At least I know you would not wish me to defer to your authority, as long as not convinced.—

I quite agree to what you say about our agragrian 1 plants being accustomed to cultivated land & so no fair test: Buckman has I think published this notion with respect to N. America.—2 With respect to road-side plants I cannot feel so sure that these ought to be excluded, as animals make roads in many wild countries.—

I have now looked & found passage in F. Müllers letter to me, in which he says In the wildernesses of Australia some Europaean perennials are “advancing in sure progress” “not to be arrested” &c.— he gives as instances (so I suppose there are other cases) eleven species. viz 3 Rumex Poterium sanguisorba— Potentilla anserina, Medicago sativa, Taroxicum officinale, Marubium vulgare. Plantago lanceolata P. major, Lolium perenne.— All these are seeding freely.—3

Now I remember years & years ago your discussing with me how curiously easily plants, get naturalised on uninhabited isld, if ships ever touch there: I remember we discussed packages being opened with old hay or straw &c.— Now think of Hides & wool (& wool exported largely over Europe) & plants introduced & samples of corn; & I must think that if Australia had been the old country, & Europe had been the Botany Bay very few, very much fewer Australian plants would have run wild in Europe, than have now in Australia.— The case seems to me much stronger between La Plata & Spain.— Nevertheless I will put in my one sentence on this head, illustrating the greater migration during Glacial period from N. to S. than reversely, very humbly & cautiously.—4

I am very glad to hear you are making good progress with your Australian Introduction.— I am, thank God, more than half through my Ch. on Geograph. Distrib. & have done the abstract of Glacial part.—

I am disgusted at A. De Candolle. How a man can think a begged honour, worth having I cannot understand! I shd. have thought his claims above A. Grays; but of course do not hesitate a second after what you say, & if consulted by anyone, will so express myself.—5

I never did pick anybody’s pocket, but whilst writing my present chapter I keep on feeling, (even when differing most from you!) just as if I were stealing from you, so much do I owe to your writings & conversations; so much more than mere acknowledgments show.—

Farewell my dear Hooker | Yours ever | C. Darwin

With respect to Nilgherri it is not worth explaining—but I shd. look at an Australian plant settling in the great northern temperate Workshop, as a greater victory than on a mountain-summit or mere island on the land—but this is perhaps mere hair-splitting—

I have been skimming through Griffiths Indian Travels, which are too purely & technically Botanical for me.6 And I have been astounded at his admiration of Swainson; says he will get his Rules framed & follow them implicitly—that number is everything.—7 This is “humbling” with a vengeance.—

Footnotes

CD’s misspelling of ‘agrarian’.
Possibly a reference to Buckman 1856, p. 515, in which James Buckman mentioned the fact that Poa pratense, when inadvertently exported to North America, overran great tracts of cultivated land to the extent that many botanists believed it native to America.
See letter to J. D. Hooker, 20 January [1859]. The letter from Ferdinand Jakob Heinrich von Mueller has not been found.
See Origin, pp. 379–80.
Griffith 1847. William Griffith had been a botanist in the East India medical service before his death in 1845. CD recorded having read this book on 29 January 1859 (Correspondence vol. 4, Appendix IV, 128: 24).
William Swainson was a prominent advocate of the quinarian system of classification, in which organisms were arranged in groups of five. For CD’s criticism of Swainson’s views, see Correspondence vol. 3, letter to J. D. Hooker, 31 March [1844].

Bibliography

Correspondence: The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt et al. 27 vols to date. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1985–.

Griffith, William. 1847. On the impregnation of Dischidia. [Read 2 March 1847.] Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 20 (1846–7): 391–6.

Origin: On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1859.

Summary

CD not convinced that naturalisation of European plants abroad is strictly dependent on creation by agriculture of disturbed ground.

More than half through his chapter on geographical distribution.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-2406
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Sent from
Down
Source of text
DAR 115: 4
Physical description
8pp

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 2406,” accessed on 26 September 2021, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2406.xml

Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 7

letter