To G. J. Romanes 6 January 1882
Down, | Beckenham, Kent. | (Railway Station | Orpington. S.E.R.)
Jan 6th 1882
My dear Romanes
I had no intention to trouble you about preparing the paper, but you seem to be quite untirable & I am glad to shirk any extra labour. It is shabby of me, but I gladly accept your offer to prepare a paper for Linn. Soc. if you think fit, & an abstract for Nature. I can thus send copies to the Baron & Dr. Glass.— By the way I cannot remember which of the two started the plan so this must be left in the dark.— As it wd appear so odd the sending of a document signed & stamped without some explanation, I think it is quite necessary that the paper shd. be presented with some such statement as I have written down.1
As it can do no harm I have scribbled down the headings of the sort of paper which I shd. have made, had I not shabbily allowed you to undertake the task.2
I quite agree about the Microscope & Grant Allen3
Yours very sincerely | Ch. Darwin
[Enclosure]
Mr. Darwin received, as he informs me, about two years ago a letter from the Baron de Villa Franca in Brazil, stating that he had raised new varieties of the Sugar-Cane by planting distinct varieties in apposition. As far as Mr Darwin can remember he expressed in answer his doubts whether the growth in close apposition of two varieties could possibly affect the character of the buds produced by either variety; & he thought it more probable that the new variety was due to bud-variation, which might be favoured by the conditions to which the cuttings had been subjected & is in itself an interesting fact.4 Recently he has received through the Brazilian Legation a letter from the Baron, enclosing one from Dr Glass, Superintendent of the Bot. Garden at Rio de Janeiro, in which he minutely describes the process adopted, a translation of which will be immediately given. The Baron also encloses a statement by eight land-owners & distinguished men in Brazil, made before a public notary, testifying to the fact that new & valuable varieties have been raised by this process.5 The subject is interesting because so few cases &c &c
Enlarge a little on physiological importance.—
Potatoes
Hyacinth
Blotched trees &c
Vines
Dr G. describes in detail with diagrams his attempts at first to graft together 2 varieties of the Sugar-cane & that he always failed, notwithstanding that he succeeded with another Monocotyledon, viz Dracaena—
Then Translation
Then Summary of the notices drawn up before the public Notary.—
(Then a brief Summary of the whole)
Perhaps a short discussion on the physiological importance of case wd. come in here best; but it is on the other hand advantageous to attract reader’s attention early in the day—
Would it not be adviseable to express a hope that Dr. Glass would describe minutely the differences between the 2 joined varieties & the detailed character of the consequent new form?
The increased vigour of the new varieties thus raised, like cross-fertilised vars., deserves notice.—
Footnotes
Summary
Accepts GJR’s offer to prepare sugar-cane paper for publication [Villa Franca and Glass, "New varieties of sugar-cane", Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. (1880–2): 30–1]. Suggests introduction and outline.
Agrees with GJR on microscope for Grant Allen.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-13600
- From
- Charles Robert Darwin
- To
- George John Romanes
- Sent from
- Down
- Source of text
- American Philosophical Society (Mss.B.D25.611), DAR 207: 4
- Physical description
- ALS 3pp encl 2pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 13600,” accessed on 26 September 2022, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-13600.xml