From Francis Darwin [after 2 June 1879]1
Dear Father,
Here is an abstract about the firs: Stahl says it is impossible to be certain about your piece of wood but he thinks a little fir tree growing on a branch out of such a lump can be nothing but the Hexenbesen; there is mycelium in the wood you sent but that alone is not enough.2 He says there are lots of affected trees near Strassbourg & he could easily send us a young tree with a hexenbesen on it in the autumn. Have you noticed the young shoots of scotch fir how vertically they grow up, while spruce buds curve downwards slightly like hazel buds. The Finlander is experimenting on the horizontal underground shoots of Scirpus &c & finds they have just the same instinct to grow horizontally as an ordinary shoot has to grow vertically—which is the much abused “transversal-geotropismus” of Frank only his transvers: geotr was with above ground things which are affected by light—3 I will ask more about Krause— Stahl who is not usually severe called him an “abscheulicher Mensch” but Stahl as French hates Berliners: every one hates Kosmos I think as the organ of “uncultivated materialism”—4
Hermann Müller has been christened Kohlenstoff Müller because he was complained of for teaching the boys in school that they should not believe “in the beginning was the word” but “in the beginning was Carbon”!5
I have got two good Porlieras in a room where I can do what I like & I will keep one in damp earth & one in dry &c & make careful observns.6 I am very glad you are done with old Eras7
I am very sorry about poor Jimmys pit & also for Pouts’ horse8 yrs affec | FD
[Enclosure]
Bot Zeitung 1867 p257
A de Bary Ueber den Krebs und die Hexenbesen der Weisstanne Abies pectinata9
The Krebs consists of a lump on the stem or branches, the swelling is about twice the diameter of the stem above & below it. Remarkable for very thick bark which is externally deeply cracked. Ultimately the bark comes off the & wood rots extensively. The wood & especially bark is crowed with mycelium which is continued into the branches that grow out of the swellings & reproduces itself in the young leaves. The branches growing out of the swellings are the little upright trees or Hexenbesen. He speaks also of hexenbesen growing out of the stem— {for Hexenbesen he quotes De Bary Ann Sc Nat 4 Sér, Tom XX p 90}.10 The fungus is Æcidium elatinum:11 he speaks of the mycelium growing from a swelling into “side branches” without producing reproductive organs, which latter are only in the true hexenbesen. The hexenbesen is only formed when the mycelium grows from the swelling into a bud beginning to elongate If it grows into already unfolded though still young shoots it does not produce a hexenbesen, only another swelling One and the same swelling may produce hexenbesen and normal branches Normal shoots free from mycel may come from hexenbesen. The hexenbesen are found all over the tree, most rarely at the summit of a young tree. The hexenbesen-shoots may either grow from the very first vertically up, or bend upwards with a bent piece. The first year they are simple shoots, & form a winter bud at the top. The branches which grow from the main hexenbesen axis are like the primary branches of a young fir tree & grow out on all sides
Hexenbesen—
The leaves fall off in autumn & are rather smaller than normal, “Krautartig-fleischig”12 & light yellow green in colour. If the fungus does not fructify which is very rare they the leaves live over the winter “The hexenbesen sits on the branches like a strange looking bush in winter bare, in summer light green” Imitating a a little fir tree if it grows regularly or looking like a confused bush if it has grown irregularly. The hexenbesen are usually more regular in growth when only one grows out of a swelling. They usually die in a few years but may live in one case 16 years In the hexenbesen, as in the swellings, the bark is very thick. “Very rarely one finds side shoots on the hexenbesen free from mycelium which then assume all the properties of normal fir branches”13
(I dont understand this as I thought the side branches of the hexenbesen were always like normal branches of a young fir tree. F D)
CD annotations
Footnotes
Bibliography
Bary, Anton de. 1863. Recherches sur le développement de quelques champignons parasites. Annales des sciences naturelles (botanique) 4th ser. 20: 5–148.
Bary, Anton de. 1867. Ueber den Krebs und die Hexenbesen der Weisstanne (Abies pectinata DC.). Botanische Zeitung 25: 257–64.
Cittadino, Eugene. 1990. Nature as the laboratory. Darwinian plant ecology in the German Empire, 1880–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Collander, Runar. 1965. The history of botany in Finland, 1828–1918. Translated by David Barrett. Helsinki: [Finnish Society of Sciences].
Erasmus Darwin. By Ernst Krause. Translated from the German by W. S. Dallas, with a preliminary notice by Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1879.
Frank, Albert Bernhard. 1870. Die natürliche wagerechte Richtung von Pflanzentheilen und ihre Abhängigkeit vom Lichte und von der Gravitation. Leipzig: Weissbach.
Frank, Albert Bernhard. 1873. Zur Frage über den Transversalgeotropismus und -Heliotropismus. Botanische Zeitung 31: 17–23; 33–9; 49–57.
Krause, Ernst. 1879a. Erasmus Darwin, der Großvater und Vorkämpfer Charles Darwin’s: ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Descendenz-Theorie. Kosmos 4 (1878–9): 397–424.
Schweingruber, Fritz Hans. 2007. Wood structure and environment. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Vries, Hugo de. 1872. Ueber einige Ursachen der Richtung bilateralsymmetrischer Pflanzentheile. Arbeiten des botanischen Instituts in Würzburg 1 (1871–4): 222–77.
Summary
Geotropism.
Experimenting on Porlieria in damp and dry earth.
Hermann Müller has been ridiculed for teaching children "in the beginning was Carbon".
Will ask about Ernst Krause.
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-12075
- From
- Francis Darwin
- To
- Charles Robert Darwin
- Sent from
- Würzburg
- Source of text
- DAR 209.5: 230–2
- Physical description
- ALS 2pp †, CD note, encl 2pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 12075,” accessed on 26 September 2022, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-12075.xml