skip to content

Darwin Correspondence Project

To Samuel Newington   1 September [1875]1

Bassett Southampton

Sep 1

Dear Sir

I am much obliged for your kind letter.

I cannot believe in the possibility of the hybrid in question. I have examined one such bird, & cleaned its skeleton & it was a pure duck. Mr Bartlett of the Zoolog. Soc. has examined the bones of several such birds with the same result. The correlation however in all these cases between deficient swimming membrane & a deformed narrow beak, is extremely curious, & accords with some other facts.2

The case of the vine interests me more; but I do not understand whether the whole of the Madresfield Court vine now bears rounded berries, or whether a shoot has been produced from the point of inarchment.3 I do not return home untill the 11th, & the state of my health prevents my coming to see this vine, which you are so kind as to offer to shew me.4

If you are inclined to take the trouble to send me half a dozen berries (ticketed with their names) of the pure Hamburgh, the pure Madresfield Ct, 2 of the modified Madresfield, together with information, or a little sketch of the inarched specimen, the information might be of very great use to me.

I have lately been writing on an allied subject, & my article is not yet printed off—5 The specimens, if you kindly agree to send them may be addressed here, or after my return home, to Down Beckenham.— If by Railway, to Orpington Station S.E.R.

Dear Sir | yours faithfully | Charles Darwin

Footnotes

The year is established by the relationship between this letter and the letter from Samuel Newington, 30 August 1875.
Newington had described what he suspected was a duck–fowl hybrid in a now missing enclosure to his letter of 30 August 1875 (for more on the hybrid, see his letter of 10 December 1875). Abraham Dee Bartlett was superintendent of the Zoological Gardens in Regent’s Park, London. CD had briefly discussed the link between certain seemingly unrelated variations, which typically occurred together, in Origin, pp. 9 and 114–17, and gave a fuller explanation of the phenomenon in Variation 2: 319–38.
Newington had written about two vines growing on their own roots but grafted (inarched) together, one of which seemed to have given its character to the other (letter from Samuel Newington, 30 August 1875).
CD was in Southampton from 28 August to 11 September 1875 (CD’s ‘Journal’ (Appendix II)).
The article has not been identified.

Bibliography

Origin: On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. By Charles Darwin. London: John Murray. 1859.

Variation: The variation of animals and plants under domestication. By Charles Darwin. 2 vols. London: John Murray. 1868.

Summary

Cannot believe in possibility that the duck is a hybrid, but correlation accords with some other facts.

Requests specimens of berries and more information about the Madresfield Court vine.

Letter details

Letter no.
DCP-LETT-10143
From
Charles Robert Darwin
To
Samuel Newington
Sent from
Bassett
Source of text
Cleveland Health Sciences Library (Robert M. Stecher collection)
Physical description
LS(A) 4pp † (by ?)

Please cite as

Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 10143,” accessed on 19 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-10143.xml

Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 23

letter