From Anton Dohrn 31 May 1875
Naples. Palazzo Torlonia.
31. May. 75.
Dear Mr. Darwin!
Many thanks for Your kind letter.1
I am very open to see my little pamphlet abused, and therefore very thankful if it meets at least some interest.2 I am quite aware of its revolutionary character,—but I am equally convinced of its truth.
To expect that authorities will soon acknowledge the whole or even a part of the speculations would be very wrong on my part. Gegenbaur and Haeckel for instance have always followed the very opposite doctrine, and even in his last publication, in the introduction to his new Periodical “Morphologisches Jahrbuch” Gegenbaur abuses very much the view I propose, and calls it the very extract of uncritical and unscientific method and view.3 We have been quarrelling on that chapter for many years,— and his opposition cannot teach anything new to me. To call opponents ignorant, uncritical, unscientific is a matter of taste rather, than a serious refutation; should Prof. Haeckel wish to come down upon me, I am prepared to read quite other things, to be more or less declared a lunatic. All this may be a great satisfaction to its author’s but can hardly increase the authority of their position, and I am very satisfied, that already among the younger Zoologists there is a strong disposition to accept my views.4 All I could possibly expect by the publication of my pamphlet was to put a stop to the dogmatical treatment of the Amphioxus-Ascidian affair, and to open new roads for speculation and investigation on the sides of the Annelid-homology. I think, this has already been achieved, and I am now busy to take up a special question and work it into a more complete form.
I regret to have added the exposition of my belief into a general degeneration throughout the whole organic world. But even that meets here and there with a partial approval, and will have some influence on the treatment of morphological investigation. I myself believe it very much.5
I am very sorry to read that the Anderson-School is not doing well. I know how expensive these institutions are, when fully at work, but the Americans ought to keep it up.6 The Zool. Station is flourishing and would be much more so, had not the bad financial state of Germany and everywhere put a restriction on the generosity of rich people. I hope nevertheless to carry it more and more to perfection.7
Hoping that Your health has not disappointed You to much in these last times and wishing for its improving I add my kindest regards to Mrs. Darwin and Your sons and to Yourself and remain, dear Mr. Darwin | Your | sincerely devoted | Anton Dohrn
Footnotes
Bibliography
Dohrn, Anton. 1875. Der Ursprung der Wirbelthiere und das Princip des Functionswechsels. Genealogische Skizzen. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann. [Reprinted in Theory in Biosciences 125 (2007): 181–241.]
Gegenbaur, Carl. 1875. Die Stellung und Bedeutung der Morphologie. Morphologisches Jahrbuch 1 (1875–6): 1–19.
Marcou, Jules. 1896. Life, letters, and works of Louis Agassiz. 2 vols. London and New York: Macmillan and Co.
Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. 1985. The German Empire, 1871–1918. Leamington Spa and Dover, N.H.: Berg Publishers.
Winsor, Mary Pickard. 1991. Reading the shape of nature. Comparative zoology at the Agassiz museum. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Summary
AD is aware of revolutionary character of his pamphlet [Ursprung der Wirbelthiere]. Authorities will not agree with him. Carl Gegenbaur and Ernst Haeckel are opposed. Younger biologists are disposed to accept his views. All he can expect is to put a stop to "the Amphioxus–Ascidian affair, and to open a road for speculation and for investigation on the side of the Annelid-homology".
Letter details
- Letter no.
- DCP-LETT-10003
- From
- Felix Anton (Anton) Dohrn
- To
- Charles Robert Darwin
- Sent from
- Naples
- Source of text
- DAR 162: 216
- Physical description
- ALS 4pp
Please cite as
Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 10003,” accessed on 25 April 2024, https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/?docId=letters/DCP-LETT-10003.xml
Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 23